federal court

Judge Raymond Kethledge: Show Us the Text. Where Does Federal Sixth Circuit Court Clerk, Alicia Harden, Derive the Power to Ignore FRAP 2?

by

by Adrienne Rockenhaus TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE RAYMOND KETHLEDGE: Your Honor has built a distinguished judicial legacy on a single, powerful principle: The Text is the Law. You have written extensively against the “Administrative State” and the danger of allowing unelected bureaucrats to invent powers that Congress never gave them. In your landmark opinion in … Read more

Judge Karen Nelson Moore: Sixth Circuit Court Federal Clerk Alicia N. Harden is Blocking a TBI Veteran from “Next Friend” Access in Violation of Whitmore

by

by Adrienne Rockenhaus TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE KAREN NELSON MOORE: Your Honor has long been the conscience of the Sixth Circuit regarding the rights of the incarcerated. You have written extensively on the necessity of providing access to the courts for those who cannot speak for themselves, most notably in your opinion in Stiltner v. … Read more

Does Sixth Circuit Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton Know That Clerk Alicia Harden Has Seized Article III Powers in US v. Rockenhaus?

by

by Adrienne Rockenhaus A Clerk in the mailroom just overruled the Supreme Court’s Whitmore standard. If the Chief Judge didn’t sign this order, who is running the Sixth Circuit? TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUDGE JEFFREY S. SUTTON: Your Honor has spent a distinguished career warning against the creeping power of the Administrative State. You have … Read more

Detroit Federal Court Scandal: How the Liggins and Rockenhaus Cases Prove Judge Stephen J. Murphy III’s Bias

by

By Adrienne Rockenhaus In 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit sent a clear message to Detroit’s federal bench: judges cannot govern by personal grievance. The court vacated the conviction of Leron Liggins because U.S. District Judge Stephen J. Murphy III had abandoned his neutral role, stating the defendant “looks like a … Read more

Sixth Circuit Shadow Docket in Cincinnati: Proof Alicia N. Harden Operated Without Judicial Authority for 20 Months

by

by Adrienne Rockenhaus My Disabled Veteran Husband is Being Murdered for Blowing the Whistle, and The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is Willfully Enabling It My disabled veteran husband is dying from a head injury inflicted on him by the U.S. Marshals, during an illegal raid on my home. FCI Milan refuses to treat him, … Read more

The Rockenhaus Family and the Eastern District of Michigan’s Systemic Breakdown

by

by Adrienne Rockenhaus Conrad Rockenhaus Should Not be Seizing to Death in a Cage The Eastern District of Michigan Courts and DOJ had a dozen “off-ramps” before it got to this point. They chose this. They Could Have Stopped the Harm Months Ago, Yet Chose to Make it Worse Every single time they had a … Read more

JUSTICE BOUGHT BACK: Judge Sally Berens (W.D. Michigan) Tried to Dismiss a Dying Veteran for Being Poor: Here Is How a $405 Donation Just Forced Her Hand

by

(Above Photo: Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens, Western District of Michigan) by Adrienne Rockenhaus When bureaucratic actions result in a murder, it is still a murder. TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN: You thought you had us trapped. You thought you could price a dying, brain-injured veteran out of justice. You failed. The Cowardice – … Read more

JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT: Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey Dismissed Evidence of Neo-Nazi Guards and Torture to Protect a New U.S. Attorney

by

TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JUDICIAL COUNCIL: On December 18, 2025, U.S. District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey outright dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition of disabled veteran Conrad Rockenhaus (Case 2:25-cv-12913). This was after more than 3 months of ignoring our life-or-death filings. This is not normal. The Cover-Up: Judge Grey justified the dismissal by claiming Conrad … Read more

From “Looks Like a Criminal” to “Wife’s Behavior”: Federal Judge Stephen J. Murphy III (E.D. Michigan) Hasn’t Learned a Thing

by

by Adrienne Rockenhaus In United States v. Liggins (2023), the Sixth Circuit overturned Judge Stephen Murphy III’s ruling because he judged a Black man based on his appearance, stating on the record that the defendant “looks like a criminal to me.” In my husband’s case, the record proves Judge Murphy judged a disabled veteran based … Read more