Meet U.S. Probation Officer Stylianos Agapiou
Aka “Stelly” Agapiou. He is the “trigger man” of the Rockenhaus Matter in Michigan. A formal, evidence-backed complaint for his unprofessional conduct and harassment was filed by Adrienne Rockenhaus on February 13, 2025. The response from his superiors was not an investigation; it was a swift and brutal campaign of retaliation. Officer Agapiou is not just a subordinate in this conspiracy; he is its origin point. This page contains the public record of his misconduct.
The No-Contact Violations Timeline: A Pattern of Defiance (Feb-Aug 2025)
Based on Exhibits M, AH, O from the Nov 19, 2025 Emergency Motion to the 6th Circuit (full PDF here). These breaches aren’t oversights, they’re deliberate escalations post my Feb 13 complaint, weaponizing my status as a civilian witness to terrorize and silence.
Feb 20, 2025: Immediate Defiance
I issued a clear written directive: “Cease all contact due to harassment and threats to report your conduct.” Agapiou replied in the same thread within minutes, violating it on sight (Exhibit M texts). This wasn’t compliance; it was a middle finger to boundaries, kicking off the retaliation machine.
Aug 13, 2025: Interstate Stalking & Seizure
Agapiou and supervisor Jeffry Konal ambushed my home unannounced, seizing my business Apple Watch/iPhone (approved work devices, Exhibit I). When I remotely erased them as lost/stolen via Find My (Exhibit AH), he called screaming, “You aren’t on supervised release!” then hung up: pure aggression across state lines, forcing Conrad to drive (seizure-risk suicide mission). No jurisdiction, no notice: Just raw intimidation.
Aug 20, 2025: Judicial Weaponization
Agapiou’s second perjured petition (Exhibit O) drags me in as the villain, “the wife” behind a fabricated OnStar call (disproved by records, Exhibit P), to justify Conrad’s arrest. This indirect breach turns my existence into court ammo, timed to sabotage his Oct release. Perjury under oath, served to Judge Murphy.
These violations? Coordinated hits, enabled by Dep. Chief Dion Thomas’s doxing voicemail (Exhibit AI, exploiting my DV history) and Konal’s solicited VA updates turned absconder lies (Exhibit S). It’s not supervision; it’s a chokehold.
The False Premise: How a Myth Created a Monster
“You’re that hacker I heard so much about.”
Those were the very first words U.S. Probation Officer Stylianos Agapiou said to Conrad Rockenhaus when he took over the case in September 2024.
He didn’t say, “I’m here to help you rehabilitate.” He didn’t say, “Let’s review your medical needs.” He said, “You’re the hacker.”
This admission proves that Officer Agapiou was not assigned to supervise a disabled veteran; he was assigned to hunt a “National Security” ghost. Before he ever stepped foot in our home, he had been briefed by his superiors (likely during the transition to Jerome Gorgon’s National Security administration) that Conrad was a high-level digital threat.
The “Forensic Expert” Fraud Officer Agapiou justified his aggressive tactics by claiming to be the probation office’s “Computer Forensic Expert.” The reality is far more embarrassing for the federal government.
During his initial search, Agapiou saw Conrad wife’s iPad (his wife with no criminal record, and not on supervision), a powerful device capable of network administration, and dismissed it entirely, stating:
“That’s ok, you can’t hack from an iPad.”
This single sentence exposes the terrifying incompetence at the heart of this investigation.
- He is not an expert: Any IT professional knows an iPad is a fully capable tool for the activities Agapiou was supposedly looking for.
- He was chasing a movie script: He was looking for a server farm or a “war room.” When he found a disabled man and his wife watching Maury Povich reruns on a tablet, his narrative collapsed.
The Retaliation Motive Because he couldn’t find the “Super Hacker” he was promised, Agapiou had a choice: admit his intelligence briefing was wrong, or invent a crime. He chose the latter. Unable to accept that Conrad was simply a disabled veteran watching daytime TV, Agapiou decided that Conrad’s traumatic brain injury must be “tradecraft” and his confusion must be “defiance.” He destroyed a man’s life simply because he was disappointed that the “Spy Movie” he thought he was starring in turned out to be a tragedy about medical neglect.
The Monstrous Hypocrisy
Officer Agapiou is a key enforcer of the “Impossible Work Mandate“, the cruel and contradictory order that Conrad Rockenhaus, a 100% disabled veteran, must work full-time.
Our investigation has confirmed that Officer Agapiou himself works a second job as an Amazon Flex driver because he cannot make ends meet on his federal salary. This is the man trying to send a disabled veteran back to prison for not being able to work.
A Pattern of Lies: The Fraudulent Warrant
On August 20, 2025, Officer Agapiou signed a petition for a warrant under penalty of perjury. This official court document contained multiple verifiably false claims designed to secure Conrad’s arrest, including a fabricated story about Conrad using his vehicle’s OnStar service and false claims that his restitution payments had “bounced”. This was not a mistake; it was a deliberate act of perjury to mislead a federal judge.
(Read Agapiou’s signed warrant petition here)
The Intimidation Tactic
Professional officers of the court schedule their visits. Conspirators show up unannounced and test your door handle when you are not home. This screenshot, captured by our doorbell camera, shows Officer Agapiou doing exactly that. A clear act of intimidation designed to terrorize a private citizen in her own home.
The Confession of Guilt: Flight from the Courtroom
On September 4, 2025, when Conrad Rockenhaus suffered a grand mal seizure in the courtroom (a direct result of the violent raid Officer Agapiou and his colleagues initiated) he and his supervisor, Jeffry Konal, fled. They disappeared.
Innocent officers render aid. Guilty men run. Their flight from the scene of their own crime was a silent, screaming confession of their guilt.
Impunity in Action: How the System Shields the Trigger Man (Dec 2025)
Agapiou’s origin sins: complaint retaliation, no-contact defiance, perjured warrants… should’ve ended his career.
Instead, the courts strike evidence and voices to keep him untouchable.
Dec 16 Strike: Magistrate Judge Sally Berens yanks my Next Friend objections to Conrad’s Bivens dismissal R&R (ECF 11), citing “non-lawyer spouse” rules, completely ignoring Whitmore precedent and Conrad’s TBI incapacity (Exhibits AB, E). This erases Agapiou’s harassment proofs from the record.
Dec 18 Double-Whammy: Judge Jonathan J. C. Grey dismisses the §2241 habeas (ECF 15/16) on “wrong vehicle” technicals, ducking 8th Am neglect tied to Agapiou’s raid-enabling warrant. Same day, Murphy strikes Conrad’s compassionate release (ECF 47) for address redaction… sidestepping Milan torture as “his” violations, not Agapiou’s fraud.
These aren’t rulings; these are cover ups. And the people responsible are deliberately letting my husband deteriorate without medical care.
Stylianos Agapiou’s lies live on, Conrad Rockenhaus dies in silence. The 6th Circuit motion (filed Nov 19) demands disqualification.
Conclusion: A Portrait of a Corrupt Officer
A financially desperate man who punishes a disabled veteran for the crime of being unable to work. An officer who lies under oath to a federal judge. An intimidator who jostles the door handles of private citizens. A coward who flees the scene when confronted with the medical consequences of his own violence.
This is the public record of Stylianos Agapiou. The question for the U.S. District Court is simple: Is this the standard of conduct The Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit/Ann Arbor) demands from their officers?
See the official court docs and mountains of evidence against Probation Officer Stylianos Agapiou in our press kit.