TO THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK (6TH CIRCUIT)
Attn: Clerk of Court Kelly L. Stephens & Case Manager Alicia N. Harden
Regarding Case #25-1991 (United States v Rockenhaus): I have documented the timeline of your office’s refusal to docket my emergency motion regarding the life-threatening medical neglect of a disabled veteran as well as its supplement.
(For those reading to learn the truth: Download the Emergency Motion by clicking here, and also download the Supplement to the Emergency motion by clicking here).
This motion documented serious, life-threatening violence and medical neglect of a disabled veteran.
To Alicia N. Harden: After my filing was initially rejected by the automated system (twice), you personally followed up the next day with a formal PDF letter confirming the refusal to docket.
This proves your rejection was deliberate.
You had ample time to review the “Next Friend” medical emergency content, yet you chose to enforce a procedural blockade rather than route the motion to a Judge.
You are a licensed attorney.
You know that an instant administrative rejection of a Next Friend emergency motion prevents the judicial review required by law.
By engaging in this “screening,” you are not acting as a mere clerk; you are making a legal determination that you do not have the Article III authority to make.
To Kelly L. Stephens: Your office is currently acting as an administrative blockade, preventing judicial review of documented misconduct, life-threatening safety risks, and medical danger.
Your office is acting as an administrative firewall.
If Conrad Rockenhaus suffers further harm or death because your office blocked this safety motion on procedural grounds, I will include the Office of the Clerk as a named party in the liability complaint for obstruction of due process.
Thank you for acting immediately and urgently upon this matter.
-Adrienne Rockenhaus